i read in some of the posts of aggressive removal of trees on some venerable courses in the US like Shinnecock and NGLA. are there example of any of the older UK heathland or parkland courses embarking on something similar. most/all of these courses, i assume, did not have large trees or overgrown rough when they were built. so this was no part of the architect's strategic plan. yet, 80-100 years on, these have become a big feature of the courses and not, in my judgement, for the better.
you end up spending too long looking for balls either in unkempt undergrowth, or second-cut rough which is like a pasture. also, indifferent shots (as opposed to awful shots) are quite often penalised with a lost ball. surely this is wrong? yet i think members/green committtees seem to have a machismo attitude to rough of this sort - as if the course is somehow better for its members suffering these sort of severe penalties.
any thoughts?