Paul,
E-mail me with your US postal address and I'll send you the current course planner (I have two). Top picture is, I think, par-3 17th (160 yards). Second is, I suspect, 312-yard par-4 7th, but there's something that doesn't quite look as it does today and I haven't put my finger on it. The 11th doesn't quite look like that today: there's only one bunker (on the left of the green), and the stream is now surrounded by deep and deadly rough. 4th picture is 122-yard par-3 4th, played steeply downhill from 3 o'clock in the picture. Last picture is probably 412-tard par-4 6th taken from behind the green.
Much work has been put in at Cavendish in recent years and the greens are particularly mischievous. They pride themselves on saying that little has been changed since Mack's day and the former Secretary told me that several greens had been restored to Mack's designs in recent years (not least the wicked little 9th). I agree that there is a certain affinity with Pasatiempo, but it is not its equal. I do commend the course to all interested in golf design, for there are many fascinating holes. The great thing is that it is little more than half an hour from Reddish Vale, another course that GCAers should visit if they are in the area. One word of caution - you are in the hills and lenghty periods of rain can make both courses rather soggy when all the fun goes out of the greens.
Anyone interested in Cavendish at rather greater detail is welcome to E-mail me and I'll send them a hole-by-hole account. I know it well.