TEPaul,
PV and Hollywood took different paths.
PV continued to be for championship golfers, regionally, nationally and internationally, not for the broad cross section of members that populate a local club. And as such, Hollywood became too difficult for the emerging membership, and that's why they made SUBSTANTIVE changes to the golf course over the years, always making it easier, vis a vis, bunker removal.
If PV had Woodcrest's membership, or any other local clubs membership, you can't think that it would be intact today, as it was 80 years ago.
I'm hoping that you understand the dynamic in the differences in the emerging memberships and the useage of the clubs as they evolved.
Tom MacWood,
Isn't your concession on classifying the quality of Rees's work on # 14, as brilliant, in direct conflict with your claim that the changes made to Hollywood by Rees are horrendous ?
How do you reconcile these conflicting statements ?
Perhaps you shouldn't make such broad based judgements until you've actually seen what exists both pre and post project work.
Geoff Childs,
How could I have overlooked The Knoll.
And, I don't think it needs much in the way of restoration work.
It's a wonderful golf course that few if any outside of the Northern New Jersey area have ever heard of, let alone played.
Had ownership transitioned to the members and not a college and a municipality, there's no telling how could the golf course could be.
For its architecture, its diverse features, it shouldn't be missed.
George Bahto,
How about hosting my winter-spring 2006 GCA.com get together at The Knoll ?