News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Tim Martin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Best Candidates for Restoration
« Reply #100 on: January 05, 2022, 03:34:22 PM »
Quote from: Michael Wharton-Palmer on January 05, 2022, 03:03:59 PM
Not going to happen but restoring ANGC to the look on the video game would be rather nice.


Michael-I agree that train has left the station. Ironically it may have more masters of the universe that have the least amount of say about their golf course. It will always be first and foremost about the tooniment.
Logged

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: Best Candidates for Restoration
« Reply #101 on: January 05, 2022, 05:54:53 PM »
Quote from: Chris Clouser on January 05, 2022, 02:17:08 PM
Tom Doak,


Thanks again for your work at Dornick.


Chris:


I actually got three of the courses on your list:  Dornick Hills, Bel Air, and Cherry Hills.  Or maybe Eric Iverson should really claim all of them!  Between those three and Lido, I don't have any more I'm yearning to do.
Logged

Sven Nilsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Best Candidates for Restoration
« Reply #102 on: January 05, 2022, 10:27:49 PM »
Tom:


In restropect, this thread makes you look very prescient.


Sven
Logged
"As much as we have learned about the history of golf architecture in the last ten plus years, I'm convinced we have only scratched the surface."  A GCA Poster

"There's the golf hole; play it any way you please." Donald Ross
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up