News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Buck Wolter

  • Karma: +0/-0
In Defense of Technology
« on: March 31, 2004, 05:20:21 PM »
Saw this on the Titleist web site and thought others here might find the industry take on this interesting. The S curve theory is probably of little consolation to those courses that have been left behind already.

Buck

http://titleist.com/technology/defense.asp


WEST COAST SWING VALIDATES S-CURVE OF INVENTION IN GOLF TECHNOLOGY
Driving Distance is DOWN and Scoring Average is Flat Compared to 2003

By Wally Uihlein
Chairman and CEO, Acushnet Company

 The S-Curve of invention application imparts that little manifest progress will be seen at the front end (The Breakthrough Phase) as the user community (golf equipment manufacturers, players) attempts to refine the invention (first generation large headed titanium drivers and multi-construction solid golf balls) for maximum benefit and gain.

Shortly thereafter, as the user community determines how to optimize the distinctive benefits of the inventions (The Exponential Phase), a significant acceleration in incremental performance occurs for a finite period of time. Finally, as the limits of technology are reached and the maximums of regulatory compliance are approached, the S-Curve enters its third and final phase (The Mature Phase) where the improvement is limited and gradual.

In 2003, the PGA Tour experienced The Exponential Phase of the S-Curve involving the invention and adoption of large headed titanium drivers and multi-component solid construction golf balls.

In 2004, results from the recently completed West Coast Swing further validate the S-Curve premise and indicate that we have entered The Mature Phase where, regardless of effort, improvements and increases will be gradual and modestly incremental.

Upon review of the recently completed PGA Tour West Coast Swing we see the following trends:

Winning Score in Relation to Par
The winning score in relation to par for the eight stroke-play events show virtually no change in 2004 when compared to 2003.  The average winning score in 2004 in relation to par is 19-under par.  The average winning score in 2003 was 20-under par.

Average Score for Players Making the Cut
Similarly, the average score of all players making the cut in 2004 events shows little or no change when compared to a year ago.  The year-to-date scoring average is 69.91, virtually flat versus the 70.04 average through the first eight events last year.

 Average Driving Distance
Finally, the negative current that surrounded the increase in driving distance last year seems to have subsided in 2004.  One reason may be the fact that the average driving distance of all players making the cut through the 2004 West Coast Swing is 283.2 yards, a DECREASE of 3.3 yards from the 286.5 yards at this time a year ago.  Furthermore, there are 7 players who are currently averaging more than 300 yards per drive versus 12 through February 2003.

All of the above confirm and validate what golf equipment manufacturers argued last year.  That is, let’s not jump to irrational conclusions.  The past few seasons, and most particularly in 2003, have featured a textbook demonstration of the S-Curve of technology at work where during The Exponential Phase; performance enhancements are distinctive and significantly incremental.  However, as we have seen before, this Exponential Phase, this spike in the letter S, is soon followed by The Mature Phase, where there is a return to a slow and gradual increase in performance improvement.  

Golf on the PGA Tour is now in The Mature Phase, and the statistics from the West Coast Swing are early, solid proof.

This helps explain why the anti-technology hawks that were so eager to swoop last year have been so quiet.

It helps explain why the USGA, R&A and PGA Tour have taken the judicious wait-and-see position they currently hold.

And, most of all, it helps explain why we as manufacturers continue to advance the idea of balanced and objective coverage of the so-called Distance Debate.

Those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience -- CS Lewis

Tom Ferrell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In Defense of Technology
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2004, 05:56:11 PM »
Umm, so the new Titleist equipment does NOT help players hit it longer or score better?  Where's that 2004 catalog?

Sheesh.

TOM


Tim_Weiman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In Defense of Technology
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2004, 06:27:58 PM »
The idea that the manufacturers want to encourage a "balanced and objective" debate about technology is the silliest thing I've heard on the whole subject.

When have we seen the major media - either print or electronic (television) run anything that seriously questions the impact of technology on the game?

Wally Uihlein is downright insulting to our intelligence.

Tim
Tim Weiman

Tom Ferrell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In Defense of Technology
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2004, 07:22:49 PM »
Actually, Wally is just doing what businessmen do - striving to protect his brand and maintain the value of his enterprise.  The ones who insult our intelligence are located not in Massachussetts but in Far Hills, New Jersey.  

TOM

Alfie

Re:In Defense of Technology
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2004, 07:42:39 PM »
Lies - damned lies - and statistics !

Winning scores - average scores & average distances ?

Was there any gauge made upon the average distance each course had been lengthened / tightened up by ?

How about the averages based upon the number of 3 woods and long irons from the tee ?

I agree with both Tim and Tom that it's an insult.

I'm still one of those anti-technology hawks. Hawks do tend to have very clear eyesight !

Wally obviously hasn't visited golfclubatlas in the past couple of year's ? That's a bloody insult too !

Alfie Ward

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back