Doug Siebert,
It may not be that easy to create a deep bunker that doesn't play steep
Size can be constrained by the architect's desire for continuity. It would seem unusual for an architect to avoid steepness by greatly expanding the size of a bunker if the balance of the golf course has a bunker style that conflicts with that concept.
Steepness, from the perspective of playability can be a function of the ball's proximity to the bunker wall. As a ball is moved away from the wall the impact of steepness can diminish.
But, depth requires that the extracating shot have a high trajectory, steepness may accentuate that need, but that's based on the balls location relative to the bunker wall.
A more confined bunker, such as the DA at PV or the bunker fronting # 7 at NGLA will, in the great majority of cases, force the golfer to confront steepness and depth.
The VAST far size bunker on # 7 at NGLA is also very deep, probably deeper then the pot bunker, and the walls fronting the green are very steep. Even if your ball is not close to the bunker wall, because of the narrow green, especially in front, the shot plays steep, no matter how far back from the bunker wall your ball lies.
The right greenside bunker at # 3 at NGLA is big and no matter where your ball lies within its confines, it plays steep when the pin is on the right side of that green.
The bunkers you and I are talking about are greenside bunkers, and LOB wedges have softened their bite.
Deep fairway bunkers present their own problems and I would avoid them at all costs. Which leads to the question, are deep fairway bunkers usually confined to short holes, or bunkers that are located at relatively short distances from the green ?