I agree generally with Jeff Mingay and Shooter, imagine that.
The bunkering was not stale throughout, some of the originals, including the cavernous ones on the first hole are still great.
The greens are an interesting set and the reference to Shinnecock, with the sea of fescue is somewhat deserving.
The problem with the bunkering is that so many have been added. The 18th - which is top centre in the aerial - has a massive grouping of bizarre bunkers. Seems they were added by the owner who wanted to bring the total up to the same as St. Andrews.
Regarding Jeff's comments on fairway width - while I am not sure how he ascertained it during our round - it is not just width at parts. Nine should be mowed down the hill, which would end the sidehill lies and arguably be more punishing. That hole has a lot of promise, when more fairway is added.
Holes of note for me were;
Four, which I understand used to have a tree. The bunker is a little more rugged than some of the others. Great driving hole, where the rough encroaches on the most interesting fairway on the course.
Six is the equivalent of 12 at Kingsley, in that to me it provides a very different look than you have seen, but I like it.
Eight is similar to Spyglass' eighth, but I like this one better. Again great landing area, which throws alignment off on the approach.
10 has a great green complex, with some neat bunkering, but the first half of the hole is bizarre.
13 is a brilliant par three, another reference to KC, similar to the fifth. This is probably my favourite hole.
17 is another awesome par three, with a wonderful green and tough greenside bunker, which despite its awful look, poses a stern hazard.
The 18th also has one of the greatest greens I have seen, and without the 30 bunkers would be a great hole.