Tom Paul
Please reconsider your last post. The last thing we need to do on this forum is to try to drive away people who have a fresh viewpoint on things, even if they express themselves from time to time in a manner which might be esoteric or even offend some of us. I think that Barny is "here" because he knows quite a bit about golf and is interested in participating and starting conversations on that topic.
Barny
While your post might have breached the special "netiquette" of this site, it had meaning. However, it is not the first nor the last time that ad hominem attacks have been made on other participants of this DG. Hang in there, and do let us know more from where and whence you cometh.
Darren
I fully support your point that "Fazio-bashing" should be beneath us.
Tommy N
I very much respect your opinions and your (and that of Mike C, et. al. who know it, which I do not) love for Merion. However, as a long-distance observer, how do resolve your contempt for the images you have seen with the generally positive (or at least conflicting) things that have been said about a lot of the restoration by those on the ground--i.e. Tom Paul's comments after the Wilson?
All
Just because Fazio might have said things in his book that wound us due to our affection for the oldies but goodies of GCA, that does not necessarily mean that he is some sort of latter day Viking raider out to rape and pillage all the sacred and virgin objects that he sees. He has built a lot of very good golf courses. The people at Merion, AGNC, Oakmont, etc. are not complete dummies. If they were, they would hire Nicklaus or Gary Player to oversee their restorations/improvements. I very, very, very, very much doubt that Mr. Greenwood and the greens committee and the membership of Merion chose deliberately to vandalize their course, nor do I think they beleive now that they have. Some of us do. That's just our opinion. And, as Signore Mucci says, we may well be wrong.
Rich