The Golf Courses at Lawsonia (Links Course)
Wisconsin, United States of America
Even more so than Stiles and Van Kleek, Langford & Moreau deserve consideration as the finest, least known architect team of all-time.
Unfortunately, not enough is known about them with the possible exception beingRon Whitten, who notes in his Feature Interview on this site that he has accumulated one hundred old Langford blueprints. With over 200 courses to their credit (most of which are in the midwest), they were more prolific than many realize, including such gems as the nine holer at Harrison Hills in Indiana, their impressive re-work of Skokie CC in Illinois and Wakonda in Iowa.
William Langford and Theodore Moreau formed their design partnership in Chicago in 1918 and one wonders what influence Macdonald’s early version of Chicago Golf Club followed by Raynor’s 1922 re-work (right when Langford & Moreau became busy) must have had on this pair. In addition, golf architecture historian and writer Tom MacWood conjectures that Langford frequented National Golf Links of America before graduating from Yale in 1908 as well as later at Columbia where he received his Masters. MacWood reasons that such visits to NGLA, Piping Rock and perhaps Sleepy Hollow would have surely shaped Langford’s design philosophy.
And there are definite similarities between the work of Langford & Moreau (who was a civil engineer) and Macdonald and Seth Raynor (who had a civil engineering degree as well). Langford & Moreau’s courses have a somewhat engineered look, though less so than Raynor’s solo efforts. Like Raynor, they moved plenty of dirt to build up their green complexes yet seemingly moved little dirt elsewhere other than for bunker construction and tee boxes. They didn’t shy away from bold interior green contours of the sort where C.B. Macdonald assisted Raynor such as at Yale Golf Club. Another great attribute that they shared with Macdonald/Raynor was their ability to find the routing that yielded the most pleasing holes. And finally and perhaps most importantly, like Macdonald/Raynor, a primary focus of theirs was on the strategic merit of a course.
In The Golden Age of Golf Design, Geoff Shackelford quotes William Langford as follows: ‘Hazards should not be built solely with the idea of penalizing bad play, but with the object of encouraging thoughtful golf and of rewarding the player who possesses the ability to play a variety of strokes with each club.’ Shackelford goes on to provide examples of Langford’s love of alternate route holes, again highlighting the importance that Langford placed on strategy.
Victor Lawson’s farm land property that Langford & Moreau walked was treeless, open to the winds and featured nice changes in elevation (all pluses) but many of the slopes are broad in nature, which can be problematic for an architect. Yet, upon playing the course, one appreciates the golf quality in each and every hole, a sure sign in part of a superb routing.
One way in which they achieved so many remarkable holes from this site is that they didn’t dwell excessively on the par of the holes by stamping out the norm of four one shotters, four three shotters and ten two shotters. Rather, the scorecard reflects five par threes, five par fives, and eight par fours. Indeed from the 9th hole through the 14th, par is 5-3-5-3-5-3, which few architects (or owners) would have the conviction to do today. Yet, can anyone imagine a better set of holes over that portion of the property? The author can’t.
In the context of a superb routing, the golfer is reminded of another public golf course of the highest quality – the Black Course at Bethpage. Yet, unlike Bethpage, the Links Course at under 6,800 yards doesn’t rely on length to provide its challenge and is far more interesting from forty yards and in than the Black Course ever was.
Holes to Note
2nd hole, 430 yards; Langford & Moreau cut deep left and right cross bunkers into the crest of the hill 130 yards from the 2nd tee. Though not a great feat to carry them, the sight of a well hit tee ball sailing over them is a pleasing one for golfers of all levels. Some would argue that such hazards only penalize the weak golfer but imagine the view from the tee without them, and the author thinks that the hole is all the better/more satisfying for them.
3rd hole, 385 yards; Another in what becomes a long line of strategic golf holes, a bunker with a six foot high grass face dominates the inside of this dogleg to the right. The more the golfer flirts with it off the tee, the easier his approach.
5th hole, 485 yards; A wonderful gambling hole where a big tee ball either a) brings the green within reach in two or b) brings the out of bounds right or trees left into play. This is the tightest driving hole on the course and some may elect to leave the driver in the bag.
6th hole, 440 yards; For many, this is their favorite hole in Wisconsin.