Green Keeper: Brian Thompson
One of the more misleading statements bandied about in recent times is ‘Build it and they shall come.’ Scores of courses located just twenty or thirty miles from population centers are finding minimal interest from golfers in playing their fine but nothing special course. However, slightly change the statement to read ‘Build a great course and they shall come’ and there is both current as well as historical support.
Beginning along some of the remote parts of the Scottish coastline and followed by Stanley Thompson in some of Canada’s most stunning environs, great courses have attracted golfers for decades. On a worldwide basis, modern day golfers seek out courses in Bali, New Zealand, and Australia in order to enjoy great golf in unparalleled settings. In the United States, courses in Nebraska and along the coastline of Oregon have captured the same feeling of escaping from it all as some of these more exotic world locations. Yet, the key to success for the long term for these courses is predicated on the design of the course being excellent to the point where people are drawn for return visits. Therein lies the rub as few designs ever achieve the lofty goal of leaving the golfer with the strong desire to play a course again and again. Most designs lack variety, are too penal, are too one dimensional in their insistence on aerial approach shots, and in general lack golf holes with compelling strategy/qualities. Plus, many modern courses with their elevated tees and flattened landforms unveil their secrets after just a round or two. With little mystery remaining, why bother for a return game on any frequent basis?
To build a remote course that successfully appeals to people as a place to escape requires patient owners. Everything must be done right and that requires time. If any part of the creative process breaks down – the selection of the land, getting the routing and design details right, the construction process – the project will likely struggle. Though the task can be daunting, the golf world cheers when it is done right and such is the case with Sutton Bay, located forty miles northwest of Pierre, South Dakota. For over a decade, South Dakota native Mark Amundson longed to establish a retreat for golf, hunting and fishing. Of the properties he visited, one component or another was always lacking, or at least not quite unique enough to act asa lasting draw. That changed in 1995 when he was introduced to Matt Sutton, a rancher whose family worked the property that Sutton Bay now occupies a portion of for over 100 years. Bordered on one side by Lake Oahe, this remote ranch/property was one of a kind, blessed with many natural and unique landforms. The hunting (South Dakota is famous as the world’s pheasant hunting capital) and fishing/boating (walleye are abundant and Lake Oahe is over two hundred miles long and two miles wide) were the easy parts. Designing a golf course full of charm and challenge would take considerably more time and resources.
Mark Amundson knew Australian Graham Marsh as a player and a person for years. He had followed Graham Marsh‘s ever growing golf course design career. Highlighted by The Vines in Western Australia and Terrey Hills outside of Sydney and numerous highly regarded courses across Asia, Mark Amundson was keen for the Australian to come see this piece of property. Not long into Graham Marsh‘s first visit, Mark Amundson knew he had his architect. As for building the course that Graham Marsh would design, Mark Amundson was aware of a Sand Hills member by the name of Bill Kubly, whose firm Landscapes Unlimited could help with the irrigation and course construction. Once Kubly visited the property in 1999, he too realized this was a once in a lifetime opportunity. In addition to having Landscapes Unlimited construct the course, Kubly signed on as an investor. As Graham Marsh writes in the yardage book, “The brief for the golf course was simple. The course should be playable yet challenging , keep earthworks to a minimum, and preserve the natural landscape.” The course is the classic out and back routing, with the ninth green being two and a half miles from the first tee.
Course construction began late in the summer of 2001 and the course opened for limited play two years later.
Certainly, the memories from the first several visits are dominated by thoughts of playing golf in such a wonderful and secluded setting. The golfer is free to enjoy the pristine South Dakota setting as no man-made structure unrelated to the club/course can be seen at any point during the round. Lake Oahe, the unique landforms, the native grasses, the sprawling bunker complexes and the wind make Sutton Bay a course like no other. Yet, years from now after many, many rounds, will members continue to relish a game with the same enthusiasm?
The answer is yes, thanks to the outstanding quality and variety of the golf holes that were crafted from this landscape. Numerous classic features, of the exact sort that have drawn golfers to St. Andrews for years to solve the riddles of The Old Course, are present to keep the challenge forever fresh and enjoyable.
Holes to Note
First hole, 660/580 yards; For thousands of years, rain water sought ways to get from the high prairie to the nearby river. A portion of that river, now known as the Missouri River, was dammed in 1960, creating Lake Oahe. The entire Sutton Bay course is routed in, over and around the stunning landforms that were shaped into dunes by the rain water. As shown here at the first, the fairway swings left around high mounds 300 yards from the tee and then bends right around another set of dunes that begin 150 yards from the green.
Third hole, 395/375 yards; Given the current technology boom with golf equipment, modern day golf architects strugglemightily with ways to createmedium lengthholes ofinterest. When in doubt for a solution, looking toward The Old Course at St. Andrewsis always a good idea. A self professed lover of The Old Course, Graham Marsh copied one of its most famous – and least understood – design features: the fallaway green. Like The Old Course, Graham Marsh didn’t just have one or two greens slope from front to back but builtsix plusgreens scattered throughtout the course that have a significant front to back slope at some point in the putting surface. In the case of the 3rd, beautifully adapted to this South Dakota landscape, Graham Marsh perched the green atop a hillock some 400 yards from the tee. A false front gives way to the crest of the green and then it falls from the front toward the back left. Downwind during the summer playing months, the good player looks at the modest yardage and wide fairway and automatically pulls driver. The trap is sprung at this point and as with The Old Course, the secret to playing the hole may only be learnedwith time. Even if the tiger golfer finds the narrowing fairway80 to100 yards from the green, he is left with an awkward length pitch downwind to a green that runs away. Over time, the golfer will likely come to hope for a fuller shot in, one that he can spin to better combat the downwind/front hole locations at the neat 3rd. To ask a golfer to considerrestraint to a wide open fairway is a wonderful question that few architects pose.The key element to that question is nearly always a fallway green.
A rarity in modern golf – a sub 400 yard hole of great interest. Restraint from the tee will serve the golfer well.
Fourth hole, 651/553 yards; This beautifully sweeping three shotter bends left and falls down the hill toward the green with the lakein the background. The green is an extension of the fairway and thus falls away from the golfer too. This attribute determines the entire strategy for playing the hole. If going for the green in two, the golfer wants to miss the green long, leaving a relatively straight forward uphill chip back to the hole. If the golfer is laying up, he wants to do so down the left of the fairway to avoid a pitch directly over the front bunker that obscures the right half of the green. Golfers often become lazy when playing American courses because almost every green slopes toward the golfer. The strategy of where to miss shots is not all encompassing as the notion of over the green is generally removed from the equation. The owners of Sutton Bay did themselves and golfers a great service when they selected an overseas architect, one not tied to formulaic approach to golf course design that currently plagues the big name American architects.
Fifth hole, 175/165 yards; In windy locales, the architect has to be selective in building green sites that don’t allow a running approach shot. When brisk winds are coupled with one forced carry after another, most golfers become overwhelmed and the joy of the round is lost at some point. Though the owners and Graham Marsh were after a challenging course, it was never to be at the expense of playability at Sutton Bay. The fifth is one of the few forced carries to a green on the course but the natural valley it plays across makes it too good a green site to pass up. As Graham Marsh notes, finding one shot holes given the diverse topography was the easy part in routing the course; the real challenge was in finding the two and three shotters that would connect all the holes.
Sixth hole, 435/405 yards; A beautifully conceived hole: the upper right portion is wide and easy to hit off the tee yet it affords the less advantageous angle into the green. Between 115 and 160 yards from the green, this upper portion of the fairway swings left sharply, dropping thirty feet to the lower fairway which proceeds up to the green. From the lower fairway, the golfer has a perfectview of the green and has high hopes of a good approach and a one putt birdie. Thus, the rub is whether the golfer can somehow access the lower fairway off the tee. On the fly, can he carry the gully and land his ball onto the lower fairway? Or should he can aim at the large 45 yard long green side bunker, recognizing that this line will take his ball to the crest of the upper fairway and with any luck his ball will then trundle down the slope into the lower fairway. It is worth noting that the fairway is 83 yards wide at the 150 yard mark from the green, a staggering amount of width. Yet such width was not extraneous in the least as it allowed Graham Marsh to capture a natural landform within the fairway from which the hole’s entire playing strategy spins off.
Seventh hole, 405/385 yards; If property is blessed with good movement, it is up to the architect to find the routing that showcases the topography and creates the most variety in shots. Here the seventh plays sharply downhill as well as in a wind direction that the golfer has yet to face. The approach is rarely from a level lie, making distance control to the shallow green hard to judge.
Eighth hole, 610/575 yards; As the golfer strolls the course, he is presented with a varied and lovely array of backdrops to the greens, everything from long views across Lake Oahe to skyline greens to here at the eighth of a massive dune behind the green. The first two shots set up the golfer with the best look at this green complex. At over 10,000 square feet, it is one the largest on the course. As golfers have found for eighty years at Yale Golf Club, getting an approach close to the hole on a large green is no mean feat. The task is made all the more tricky here as the putting surface is obscured by a large bunker complex that commences 70 yards shy of the green. The large green is angled from back left to front right and the golfer must get his approach on the right side of the ridge that bisects the green; otherwise, a three putt is all too common.
Ninth hole, 205/180 yards; Destined to become one of the most photographed holes in the country, the ninth hole features elevated tees that afford the golfer a view across a shallow valley to the long green as it feeds off a shoulder from the hill behind the eighth green. Views across Lake Oahe to the rolling prairies on the far side go for miles. In contrast to the last green, this one is angled from front left to back right and a fade is the ideal ball shape.