Los Angeles Country Club (North)
California, United States of America

Sixth hole, 335/320 yards; Before the restoration, this was a simple drive and pitch hole as meaningful options didn’t exist. Plop the ball down the hill, wedge on and go from there. Straightforward stuff with a lot of pars and some birdies. After the restoration, a myriad of decisions confront the golfer. As a result, this hole has again become the multi-dimensional gem that Thomas installed and produces a range of scores. Give Hawk Shaw credit here too for being such careful shapers as they first picked up on the change in sand at the green site. Sure enough, the Thomas green pad was a good 10 feet lower than the present one and Hanse Design quickly set about returning it to its initial elevation. Hanse notes that ‘… by slowly peeling away the layers, we could trace the contours of the both the old second and sixth greens, which was a first for me. It was a very neat process, one that we enjoyed immensely.’ 

Where to place one’s tee shot is a subject of intense debate. To this front right flag …

... some members have concluded that the best play is to go long off the tee, past the hole, and then pitch back toward it as seen above.

… some members have concluded that the best play is to go long off the tee, past the hole, and then pitch back toward it as seen above.

As seen from behind, 40 yards of fairway extend from the green on a direct line back toward the tee. Dare the tiger try and make the carry? Under 4,000 square foot, the sixth green represents the smallest target on the course.

 

Seventh hole, 290/235 yards; Thomas opined that ‘…the truly Ideal course must have natural hazards on a large scale for superlative golf. The puny strivings of the architect do not quench our thirst for the ultimate, and as part of such topography we must include sufficient area.’ The last component of that quote centers around sufficient space and the sensible tree/shrub management program that LACC embarked upon in 2010 has had the effect to highlight LACC’s extraordinary terrain. Here at the seventh, we find ourselves secluded in a lovely valley at the low point of the property which embodies the first part of the quote and the need for natural hazards. Great design boils down to the skill of the architect to incorporate a property’s attributes into the final design, hole after hole … after hole. While a wash with its eroded walls and native vegetation makes for a fine hazard, it becomes especially fine if it runs diagonally across the hole (think thirteen at Augusta National).  Thomas did just that at the seventh.

The simple but elegant seventh makes good use of the broken ground from tee to green.

As seen from behind, the thirty yards of fairway on the side of the green becomes evident. A 290 tee from above the sixth green exists that makes this patch of fairway quite a consideration. Thomas’s concept of ‘a course within a course’ comes to fruition when the back tee is coupled with the back right hole location as the only way to access it is from the fairway short of the green.

Eighth hole, 535/535 yards; This is the third 1/2 par hole in a row, a true design rarity/accomplishment. The tiger dearly wants to strangle a ‘4’ out of this double dog-leg as the green was moved forward 30 yards to its original Thomas location but doing so is another matter altogether.  The rub is the left to right sloping fairway which frequently dictates that the second shot be played with the ball below the player’s feet, just when he would like to draw the ball – a difficult task.  Those in attendance at the North Course re-opening in the fall, 2010 still marvel at the low draw Fred Couples played from the hanging fairway lie to reach the green in two. Alas, most of us have to be content with a pitch to this right to left sloping green. Few clubs have the courage to shorten a hole as part of a restoration; give LACC full props for doing so.

This view from high left shows the spilt nature of the eighth fairway.

This view from high left shows the spilt nature of the eighth fairway.

Considering the course’s location amid a teeming urbanscape, there are a surprisingly number of quiet moments during one’s round. Crossing the bridge over the wash at the eighth is among them.

The Thomas mounds and Hanse bunkers left and the hillside on the right place an appropriate premium on accuracy at this 4 1/2 par.

As seen from behind, the eighth is a superlative switch back hole which requires a fade off the tee and a draw for one’s second. Thomas left the green open in front to reward those with the uncommon ability to execute the tandem plays.


Ninth hole, 180/180 yards;
Golf is played across the barranca on six of the first nine holes. Half of those times occur at the one shot holes whereby Thomas affords all golfers a perfect stance/lie on the tee from which to make the forced carry. More importantly, note the variety in how Thomas incorporated the wash. At the downhill fourth, it is a fronting hazard. At the level seventh, the wash is set on a diagonal. And here at the uphill ninth, the gulley is well short of play, bothering only the duffed tee ball. Talk about text book – and it didn’t happen by luck. In 2005, this oval-shaped green afforded a simple row of middle hole locations. Hanse Design recaptured nearly 25% of putting surface and returned the green to its original dimension of 6,635 square feet, primarily by expanding the green at the front, back left and along the right. A minimum of four great locations were recovered in the process with back left hole locations requiring as much as four more clubs than the front one seen below.

This view from behind hints at the 44 yard depth of the newly restored green as well as how much lower the tee is. Indeed, the ninth generally plays a full club more than the first timer imagines. This front hole location is sneakily fiendish (and didn’t exist in 2005), as most golfers are left with a dastardly quick putt from above the hole.


Tenth hole, 410/385 yards;
Not every hole can be a strategic marvel but every hole can/should be interesting to play and this one scores well in that regard. The landing area is a huge knob into which Bell carved two wonderful bunkers. From anywhere near them, the golfer is more or less level with the putting surface and is afforded a comforting view for his approach. The shorter, more direct line left off the tee and away from the bunkers leaves the golfer in a valley below the green with a stunted view of what he needs to accomplish. How best to play the hole? Each golfer must make up his own mind – and that makes the tenth interesting.

Thomas draped the holes across the land in every imaginable manner possible. Flat courses can’t begin to compete.


Eleventh hole, 275/225 yards;
The architectural merits of this famous hole equal the one-of-a-kind view and it’s a mystery where Thomas/Bell gathered all the fill to create this mammoth push-up green, which is elevated nearly twenty-five feet at the rear from its surrounds. Bell’s graceful tie-in of the massive green pad with the hillside on the left is nothing short of stellar.  Watching the drama unfold on this Reverse Redan is great sport. Considering its length, many golfers still play it as Thomas intended by hitting the ball short left and having it bounce onto the putting surface. Figuring out how to access the front hole locations will drive the amateurs crazy during the 2017 Walker Cup and the professionals bonkers during the 2023 U.S. Open. So too the putting – is the putt downhill or uphill?

A large cache of aerial shots helped Hanse Design. This is one of the rare pre-1930 ground photos that they found and it served as a template for the Billy Bunker style they emulated.

As seen in 2005, the bunkers had become sculpted and manufactured in appearance. Something needed to be done.

The first phase of work was completed in 2009 and returned the bunkers to a form that would make Thomas and Bell proud.

The second and final phase saw to the removal of shrubs, undergrowth and some trees. For the first time in decades, members and their guests could appreciate both the special property and the special architecture.

continued >>>